[THOUGHT]
First, I need to identify the poles of f(z)=z2cotz.
The cotangent function cotz=sinzcosz has poles where sinz=0. These occur at z=nπ for integers n, and each of these is a simple pole of cotz.
Therefore, f(z)=z2cotz has poles at z=nπ for all integers n, including n=0.
Order of each pole:
-
At z=0: We need to determine the order. Since cotz behaves like z1 near z=0, z2cotz behaves like z31. So, the pole at z=0 is of order 3.
-
At z=nπ for n=0: Since cotz has a simple pole at these points, dividing by z2 results in a pole of order 3 (one from cotz and two from z2).
Residues at each pole:
- At z=0: To find the residue of f(z) at z=0, we use the definition of the residue for a pole of order 3:
Res(f(z),0)=2!1z→0limdz2d2(z3f(z))=21z→0limdz2d2(zcotz).
We are given D2=−32, so:
Res(f(z),0)=21(−32)=−31.
- At z=nπ for n=0: We use the fact that cotz has residues of (−1)n at these points. The residue of z2cotz at z=nπ is:
Res(f(z),nπ)=z→nπlim(cotz)(z−nπ)2z−nπ⋅(z−nπ)3=z→nπlimsinzz−nπ⋅(z−nπ)2cosz=(−1)ncos(nπ)⋅(nπ)21.
Since cos(nπ)=(−1)n, we get:
Res(f(z),nπ)=(−1)n⋅(−1)n⋅(nπ)21=(nπ)21.
Integral along the contour Ck:
For each k=1,2,3,4, the integral Ik=∫Ckf(z)dz along Ck as M→∞:
- C1 and C3: These are vertical lines. As M→∞, ∣z∣→∞, and cotz is bounded. Therefore, ∣f(z)∣→0, making each integral vanish.
- C2 and C4: These are horizontal lines. As M→∞, the integrals also vanish because cotz oscillates between bounded values, and the length of the segment increases while the function's value decreases.
Thus, limM→∞Ik=0 for k=1,2,3,4.
Residue theorem application:
The residue theorem states:
∮Cf(z)dz=2πi∑Residues inside C.
As M→∞, the only poles inside C are at z=nπ for n=−M,−M+1,…,M.
The residues sum up as:
n=−M,n=0∑M(nπ)21+Res(f(z),0)=n=1∑M(nπ)21+n=1∑M(nπ)21−31=2n=1∑M(nπ)21−31.
Thus,
∮Cf(z)dz=2πi(2n=1∑M(nπ)21−31).
Since ∮Cf(z)dz→0 as M→∞, we have:
0=2πi(2n=1∑∞(nπ)21−31).
Solving for ∑n=1∞n21, we get:
2n=1∑∞(nπ)21=31⟹n=1∑∞n21=6π2.
Generalizing for g(z)=z2Ncotz:
The poles and residues for g(z) follow a similar pattern. The residue at z=nπ for n=0 becomes:
Res(g(z),nπ)=(nπ)2N1.
The residue at z=0 involves higher-order derivatives and is more complex, but the key idea is that the residue theorem will yield:
∮Cg(z)dz=2πi(Res(g(z),0)+2n=1∑∞(nπ)2N1).
Since ∮Cg(z)dz→0 as M→∞, we solve for the series:
0=2πi(Res(g(z),0)+2n=1∑∞(nπ)2N1).
This implies:
Res(g(z),0)=−2n=1∑∞(nπ)2N1⟹n=1∑∞n2N1=−2π2NRes(g(z),0).
For N=1, we have:
T=n=1∑∞n21=−2π2(−31)=6π2.
Final Calculation:
From I, the order p=3.
From II, the residue r=−31.
From IV, S2=6π2.
From the expression in V, T=6π2.
Using D2=−32, we compute:
K=999×(p2−1)×(−3r)×(−D2)×TS2.
Since S2=T, the ratio TS2=1, so:
K=999×(32−1)×(−3×−31)×(−32)×1=999×8×1×(−32)=999×8×−32=999×−316=−3332.
The integer value of K is:
−3332