Suppose the following conditions hold. A prize-drawing event uses a box containing 4 crimson balls and 5 blue balls. You are given four opportunities to draw a ball, without replacement.Under these conditions, you receive a prize of 100(10,000-won units) if you draw a crimson ball on the first draw, and 200(10,000-won units) if you draw a crimson ball on the fourth draw. Let be the random variable representing the total prize money obtained after drawing four balls from the box. If the expected value of is written aswhere and are relatively prime positive integers, find the value ofoindent
[THOUGHT] The problem asks for the expected value of the total prize money . Let be the event that the ball drawn on the -th draw is crimson. The total prize is given by , where is the indicator function. By linearity of expectation, .
The box contains 4 crimson balls and 5 blue balls, for a total of 9 balls. The draws are without replacement.
I need to calculate and . is the probability that the first ball drawn is crimson. is the probability that the fourth ball drawn is crimson.
Since the draws are without replacement and the balls are indistinguishable apart from color, the probability of drawing a crimson ball at any specific position (where ) is the same. So, .
Let's verify this using Python to be absolutely sure, although it's a standard probability result. I will simulate the drawing process or calculate the probabilities using combinations.
Total balls . Crimson balls . . .
Then .
So , . They are relatively prime since 400 is not divisible by 3 (sum of digits is 4). The value to find is .
I will write a Python script to calculate the exact probabilities by iterating through all permutations or using hypergeometric logic to confirm .
[/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] from itertools import permutations from fractions import Fraction
Setup
crimson_count = 4 blue_count = 5 total_balls = crimson_count + blue_count
Balls represented as 1 for Crimson, 0 for Blue
balls = [1] * crimson_count + [0] * blue_count
We draw 4 balls without replacement.
However, the probability of the k-th ball being Crimson is just Total_Crimson / Total_Balls due to symmetry.
Let's verify P(C_1) and P(C_4) by simulation or calculation.
Calculation approach:
P(C_1) is obviously 4/9.
P(C_4): Consider the sequence of 4 draws.
Total permutations of 4 balls from 9 is P(9, 4).
Number of permutations where 4th is Crimson:
Pick a Crimson for 4th spot: 4 ways.
Pick remaining 3 balls for spots 1, 2, 3 from remaining 8 balls: P(8, 3) ways.
Probability = (4 * P(8, 3)) / P(9, 4)
def nPr(n, r): import math return math.factorial(n) // math.factorial(n - r)
total_perms = nPr(total_balls, 4)
For C1 (1st is Crimson)
Pick C for 1st: 4 ways
Pick 3 from remaining 8: P(8, 3)
count_c1 = crimson_count * nPr(total_balls - 1, 3) prob_c1 = Fraction(count_c1, total_perms)
For C4 (4th is Crimson)
Pick C for 4th: 4 ways
Pick 3 from remaining 8 for spots 1, 2, 3: P(8, 3)
count_c4 = crimson_count * nPr(total_balls - 1, 3) prob_c4 = Fraction(count_c4, total_perms)
print(f"{prob_c1=}") print(f"{prob_c4=}")
expected_value = 100 * prob_c1 + 200 * prob_c4 print(f"{expected_value=}")
p = expected_value.numerator q = expected_value.denominator print(f"{p=}, {q=}")
result = p * (q**2) print(f"{result=}") [/PYTHON] [THOUGHT] The code output confirms the theoretical reasoning. . . and are relatively prime (gcd(400, 3) = 1). We need to find . .
The logic holds. The "without replacement" condition doesn't change the marginal probability of the -th draw being a specific color, provided we don't condition on previous draws. The expectation is linear, so we just sum the marginal expectations.
Final check: Prize = 100 if 1st is Crimson. Prize = 200 if 4th is Crimson. Total Prize . . . . Sum = . . .
The result seems solid. [/THOUGHT] \boxed{3600}
[THOUGHT] The Python code confirmed the probabilities and . The expected value is . Thus and . These are relatively prime. The value to compute is . [/THOUGHT] \boxed{3600}