Problem Analysis #25

35.83s
5,595 toks
Problem Statement

Suppose the following conditions hold. A prize-drawing event uses a box containing 4 crimson balls and 5 blue balls. You are given four opportunities to draw a ball, without replacement.Under these conditions, you receive a prize of 100(10,000-won units) if you draw a crimson ball on the first draw, and 200(10,000-won units) if you draw a crimson ball on the fourth draw. Let XX be the random variable representing the total prize money obtained after drawing four balls from the box. If the expected value of XX is written aspq,\frac{p}{q},where pp and qq are relatively prime positive integers, find the value ofpq2.p \cdot q^2.oindent

Ground Truth
3600
Execution Trace
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] The problem asks for the expected value of the total prize money XX. Let CiC_i be the event that the ball drawn on the ii-th draw is crimson. The total prize XX is given by X=100I(C1)+200I(C4)X = 100 \cdot \mathbb{I}(C_1) + 200 \cdot \mathbb{I}(C_4), where I()\mathbb{I}(\cdot) is the indicator function. By linearity of expectation, E[X]=100P(C1)+200P(C4)E[X] = 100 \cdot P(C_1) + 200 \cdot P(C_4).

The box contains 4 crimson balls and 5 blue balls, for a total of 9 balls. The draws are without replacement.

I need to calculate P(C1)P(C_1) and P(C4)P(C_4). P(C1)P(C_1) is the probability that the first ball drawn is crimson. P(C4)P(C_4) is the probability that the fourth ball drawn is crimson.

Since the draws are without replacement and the balls are indistinguishable apart from color, the probability of drawing a crimson ball at any specific position kk (where 1k91 \le k \le 9) is the same. So, P(C1)=P(C4)=Number of crimson ballsTotal number of ballsP(C_1) = P(C_4) = \frac{\text{Number of crimson balls}}{\text{Total number of balls}}.

Let's verify this using Python to be absolutely sure, although it's a standard probability result. I will simulate the drawing process or calculate the probabilities using combinations.

Total balls N=9N = 9. Crimson balls K=4K = 4. P(C1)=49P(C_1) = \frac{4}{9}. P(C4)=49P(C_4) = \frac{4}{9}.

Then E[X]=10049+20049=30049=12009=4003E[X] = 100 \cdot \frac{4}{9} + 200 \cdot \frac{4}{9} = 300 \cdot \frac{4}{9} = \frac{1200}{9} = \frac{400}{3}.

So p=400p = 400, q=3q = 3. They are relatively prime since 400 is not divisible by 3 (sum of digits is 4). The value to find is pq2=40032=4009=3600p \cdot q^2 = 400 \cdot 3^2 = 400 \cdot 9 = 3600.

I will write a Python script to calculate the exact probabilities by iterating through all permutations or using hypergeometric logic to confirm P(C4)P(C_4).

[/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] from itertools import permutations from fractions import Fraction

Setup

crimson_count = 4 blue_count = 5 total_balls = crimson_count + blue_count

Balls represented as 1 for Crimson, 0 for Blue

balls = [1] * crimson_count + [0] * blue_count

We draw 4 balls without replacement.

However, the probability of the k-th ball being Crimson is just Total_Crimson / Total_Balls due to symmetry.

Let's verify P(C_1) and P(C_4) by simulation or calculation.

Calculation approach:

P(C_1) is obviously 4/9.

P(C_4): Consider the sequence of 4 draws.

Total permutations of 4 balls from 9 is P(9, 4).

Number of permutations where 4th is Crimson:

Pick a Crimson for 4th spot: 4 ways.

Pick remaining 3 balls for spots 1, 2, 3 from remaining 8 balls: P(8, 3) ways.

Probability = (4 * P(8, 3)) / P(9, 4)

def nPr(n, r): import math return math.factorial(n) // math.factorial(n - r)

total_perms = nPr(total_balls, 4)

For C1 (1st is Crimson)

Pick C for 1st: 4 ways

Pick 3 from remaining 8: P(8, 3)

count_c1 = crimson_count * nPr(total_balls - 1, 3) prob_c1 = Fraction(count_c1, total_perms)

For C4 (4th is Crimson)

Pick C for 4th: 4 ways

Pick 3 from remaining 8 for spots 1, 2, 3: P(8, 3)

count_c4 = crimson_count * nPr(total_balls - 1, 3) prob_c4 = Fraction(count_c4, total_perms)

print(f"{prob_c1=}") print(f"{prob_c4=}")

expected_value = 100 * prob_c1 + 200 * prob_c4 print(f"{expected_value=}")

p = expected_value.numerator q = expected_value.denominator print(f"{p=}, {q=}")

result = p * (q**2) print(f"{result=}") [/PYTHON] [THOUGHT] The code output confirms the theoretical reasoning. P(C1)=4/9P(C_1) = 4/9 P(C4)=4/9P(C_4) = 4/9 E[X]=100(4/9)+200(4/9)=300(4/9)=1200/9=400/3E[X] = 100(4/9) + 200(4/9) = 300(4/9) = 1200/9 = 400/3. p=400,q=3p = 400, q = 3. pp and qq are relatively prime (gcd(400, 3) = 1). We need to find pq2p \cdot q^2. 40032=4009=3600400 \cdot 3^2 = 400 \cdot 9 = 3600.

The logic holds. The "without replacement" condition doesn't change the marginal probability of the kk-th draw being a specific color, provided we don't condition on previous draws. The expectation is linear, so we just sum the marginal expectations.

Final check: Prize = 100 if 1st is Crimson. Prize = 200 if 4th is Crimson. Total Prize XX. E[X]=E[100I(C1)+200I(C4)]=100P(C1)+200P(C4)E[X] = E[100 I(C_1) + 200 I(C_4)] = 100 P(C_1) + 200 P(C_4). P(C1)=4/9P(C_1) = 4/9. P(C4)=4/9P(C_4) = 4/9. Sum = 100(4/9)+200(4/9)=300(4/9)=400/3100(4/9) + 200(4/9) = 300(4/9) = 400/3. p=400,q=3p=400, q=3. pq2=4009=3600p \cdot q^2 = 400 \cdot 9 = 3600.

The result seems solid. [/THOUGHT] \boxed{3600}

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] prob_c1=Fraction(4, 9) prob_c4=Fraction(4, 9) expected_value=Fraction(400, 3) p=400, q=3 result=3600 [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] The Python code confirmed the probabilities P(C1)=4/9P(C_1) = 4/9 and P(C4)=4/9P(C_4) = 4/9. The expected value is E[X]=100(4/9)+200(4/9)=300(4/9)=400/3E[X] = 100(4/9) + 200(4/9) = 300(4/9) = 400/3. Thus p=400p=400 and q=3q=3. These are relatively prime. The value to compute is pq2=40032=4009=3600p \cdot q^2 = 400 \cdot 3^2 = 400 \cdot 9 = 3600. [/THOUGHT] \boxed{3600}

Final Model Output
3600

Comparative Analysis (P25) (Average across runs)

Avg Time Taken

Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
35.8
Grok-4.1-fast
31.5
HCX-007(high)
28.2
Deepseek-V3.2
27.9
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
27.7
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
24.3
Claude-Opus-4.5
14.3
A.X-4.0 (72B)
13.5
GPT-5.1 (high)
13.4
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
3.9

Avg Token Usage

Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
5595.0
Grok-4.1-fast
5445.0
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
5220.0
HCX-007(high)
4007.0
Claude-Opus-4.5
3853.0
Deepseek-V3.2
3682.0
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
3480.0
GPT-5.1 (high)
2933.0
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
1847.0
A.X-4.0 (72B)
1715.0