Let be a natural number with . Using one die and one coin, perform the following experiment.\begin{center}\fbox{\begin{minipage}{0.9\textwidth}Roll the die once.\quad-- If the outcome is less than or equal to , toss the coin times and record the number of heads.\quad-- If the outcome is greater than , toss the coin times and record the number of heads.\end{minipage}}\end{center}Repeat this experiment times, and let be the number of times the recorded value is . Suppose that . Using the standard normal table on the right, computeand let this value be . Compute 1000 $$\times$$ k. [4 points]\begin{center}\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}\hline & \\hline0.5 & 0.191 \\hline1.0 & 0.341 \\hline1.5 & 0.433 \\hline2.0 & 0.477 \\hline2.5 & 0.494 \\hline3.0 & 0.499 \\hline\end{tabular}\end{center}\
[THOUGHT] The problem asks us to find the value of , where . First, I need to determine the value of . Let be the random variable representing the number of heads recorded in a single experiment. The experiment has two cases based on the die roll :
- If (probability ), toss coin 5 times. Let be heads in 5 tosses. We record .
- If (probability ), toss coin 3 times. Let be heads in 3 tosses. We record .
We are interested in the event that the recorded value is 3. Let be the probability of this event in a single experiment. .
For a fair coin: . .
So, .
The experiment is repeated times. Let be the number of times the recorded value is 3. follows a Binomial distribution . The expected value is given as . Since , we have . This allows us to solve for , and subsequently for .
Once is found, we need to compute . Since is large, we can approximate the Binomial distribution with a Normal distribution , where and . We are given . We need to find . Note: The problem provides a standard normal table, suggesting this approximation is intended. Continuity correction might or might not be expected, but usually with such large numbers and the phrasing "Using the standard normal table", standard approximation is key. However, I should check if continuity correction () significantly changes the Z-score given the table values. Usually, textbook problems align with the table values (0.5, 1.0, etc.).
Let's calculate first using Python.
[/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] from sympy import symbols, solve
Define variables
a = symbols('a')
Probabilities
p_H5_3 = 10 / 32 # 5C3 * (1/2)^5 p_H3_3 = 1 / 8 # 3C3 * (1/2)^3
Probability p of recording a 3 in one experiment
p = (a/6) * p_H5_3 + ((6-a)/6) * p_H3_3
p = (a/6) * p_H5_3 + ((6-a)/6) * p_H3_3
Expected value E(X) = n * p
n = 19200 E_X = n * p
Given E(X) = 4800
equation = E_X - 4800
Solve for a
sol_a = solve(equation, a)
print(f"{sol_a=}")
[/PYTHON]
[THOUGHT]
The code output shows sol_a=[4]. So .
Now I have .
The probability is .
Let's verify with :
. Correct.
Now we need to compute . Substitute : target value is . So we want . with . Mean . Variance . Standard deviation .
We want . Using Normal approximation: .
We need to check if continuity correction is needed. With continuity correction: . Without continuity correction: . Looking at the provided table: . The table gives . We want .
If I used continuity correction, , which is not in the table. The table has steps of 0.5. This strongly suggests we should use the integer value directly resulting in a clean Z-score found in the table. So . . We need . .
Let me double check the calculations in Python to be absolutely sure. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] import math
n = 19200 a = 4 p = 0.25 mu = n * p sigma = math.sqrt(n * p * (1 - p))
target_X = 4800 + 30 * a z_score = (target_X - mu) / sigma
print(f"{mu=}") print(f"{sigma=}") print(f"{target_X=}") print(f"{z_score=}") [/PYTHON] [THOUGHT] The Python output confirms: Target
The table provided is: We want . Since the normal distribution is symmetric, . So . . The question asks for . .
Is there any ambiguity? "Let be the number of times the recorded value is 3." -> Binomial variable. "Compute ". "Using the standard normal table". The table has specific values. is exactly there. If I used continuity correction, . The table doesn't support 2.008. It supports 2.0. So the intended solution is without continuity correction or the problem is designed such that the difference is negligible for the "lookup" nature of the task. Given the discrete table steps, exact is the intended path.
Final check of the question text: "Compute ." is the probability. Result is 977.
Let's re-read to ensure no misinterpretation of "recorded value".
- Roll die.
- If : toss 5 times. Record heads.
- If : toss 3 times. Record heads.
- is count of experiments where recorded value is 3. This matches my derivation of .
Let's re-verify the calculation of for . . . If , toss 5 coins. . If , toss 3 coins. . . Correct.
. Matches given . So is correct.
Target . . . .
Table value for is (for ). Total probability . .
The solution seems robust.
One minor detail: "natural number ". If was different, say . . . So is unique.
The steps are clear.
- Formulate in terms of .
- Equate to 4800 to find .
- Calculate and .
- Calculate -score for the bound.
- Look up probability in the table.
- Multiply by 1000.
The value is the probability. . .
I will output the final answer. [/THOUGHT] [THOUGHT] The problem asks for where . From the Python code, , , . The bound is . The Z-score is . From the table, . Thus, . . . [/THOUGHT]
\boxed{977}
The random variable represents the number of times the recorded value is 3 in trials. Let be the probability of recording a 3 in a single trial. The experiment involves rolling a die (outcome ) and then tossing a coin.
- If , toss 5 times. Probability of 3 heads is .
- If , toss 3 times. Probability of 3 heads is . The probability of rolling is , and is . Thus, .
Given and , we have: .
We solve for : Multiply by 48 to clear denominators: .
We need to compute . Substitute : .
We approximate using a normal distribution . . .
Standardize the value : .
Using the provided table for : . Since we want , we add the probability of the lower half: .
Thus, . The value to compute is .
\boxed{977}