[THOUGHT]
The problem asks to evaluate the integral ∫1/227/4g(t)dt, where g(t) is the inverse function of t(s)=1+ss3.
Let s=g(t), so t=1+ss3.
The integral becomes ∫s1s2sdsdtds.
First, I need to find the limits of integration s1 and s2 corresponding to t=1/2 and t=27/4.
Then I will compute the derivative dsdt and the integral.
Steps:
- Solve 1+ss3=21 for s>0 to find s1.
- Solve 1+ss3=427 for s>0 to find s2.
- Define the integrand s⋅dsd(1+ss3).
- Compute the definite integral using SymPy.
- Format the result as qp+ln2 and find p+q.
[/THOUGHT]
[PYTHON]
from sympy import symbols, solve, diff, integrate, ln, simplify, Rational
s = symbols('s', real=True, positive=True)
Define t as a function of s
t_expr = s**3 / (1 + s)
Find s1 for t = 1/2
s^3 / (1+s) = 1/2 => 2s^3 - s - 1 = 0
s1_solutions = solve(2*s**3 - s - 1, s)
print(f"s1 solutions: {s1_solutions}")
Find s2 for t = 27/4
s^3 / (1+s) = 27/4 => 4s^3 - 27s - 27 = 0
s2_solutions = solve(4s**3 - 27s - 27, s)
print(f"s2 solutions: {s2_solutions}")
Calculate dt/ds
dt_ds = diff(t_expr, s)
print(f"dt/ds: {dt_ds}")
Integrand is s * dt/ds
integrand = s * dt_ds
print(f"Integrand: {integrand}")
We need to pick the correct real positive roots
Let's filter them in the next step or manually inspect output
[/PYTHON]
[THOUGHT]
The previous code will output the solutions. I need to identify the positive real roots s1 and s2.
Then I will perform the integration.
Let's anticipate the roots:
For 2s3−s−1=0: s=1 works (2−1−1=0). So s1=1.
For 4s3−27s−27=0: Let's test small integers or fractions.
s=3: 4(27)−27(3)−27=108−81−27=0. So s2=3.
So the limits are s1=1 and s2=3.
I will verify this in the code and then compute the integral ∫13sdsd(1+ss3)ds.
The integral expression is ∫13(1+s)2s2(2s+3)ds.
I will use SymPy to compute this exact value.
[/THOUGHT]
[PYTHON]
from sympy import symbols, integrate, simplify, ln
s = symbols('s', real=True, positive=True)
t_expr = s**3 / (1 + s)
dt_ds = t_expr.diff(s)
integrand = s * dt_ds
Limits
s1 = 1
s2 = 3
Compute integral
result = integrate(integrand, (s, s1, s2))
print(f"Result: {result}")
print(f"Simplified Result: {simplify(result)}")
[/PYTHON]
[THOUGHT]
The output of the previous code will give me the value of the integral.
Let's assume the result is something like A + ln(2).
I need to match it to qp+ln2.
Then compute p+q.
Let's double check the manual integration plan to be sure.
Integrand: s⋅(1+s)23s2(1+s)−s3=(1+s)2s(3s2+3s3−s3)=(1+s)22s4+3s3.
Wait, my previous manual derivative was (1+s)22s3+3s2.
Let's recompute dsdt.
t=1+ss3.
t′=(1+s)23s2(1+s)−s3(1)=(1+s)23s2+3s3−s3=(1+s)22s3+3s2. Correct.
Then multiply by s (since we are integrating sdt=sdsdtds).
So integrand is s⋅(1+s)22s3+3s2=(1+s)22s4+3s3.
Polynomial division:
Numerator: 2s4+3s3.
Denominator: s2+2s+1.
2s4+3s3=2s2(s2+2s+1)−4s3−2s2+3s3=2s2(s+1)2−s3−2s2.
This seems tedious. Let u=1+s, so s=u−1.
Integrand = u22(u−1)4+3(u−1)3.
=u2(u−1)3[2(u−1)+3]=u2(u−1)3(2u+1).
Expand numerator:
(u3−3u2+3u−1)(2u+1)
=2u4+u3−6u3−3u2+6u2+3u−2u−1
=2u4−5u3+3u2+u−1.
Divide by u2:
2u2−5u+3+u1−u21.
Integrate term by term with respect to u.
Limits for s: 1 to 3.
Limits for u: 2 to 4.
∫24(2u2−5u+3+u−1−u−2)du
=[32u3−25u2+3u+ln∣u∣+u−1]24.
Evaluate at 4:
32(64)−25(16)+3(4)+ln4+41
=3128−40+12+2ln2+0.25
=42.66...−28+...
=3128−28+0.25+2ln2
=3128−84+41+2ln2
=344+41+2ln2
=12176+3+2ln2=12179+2ln2.
Evaluate at 2:
32(8)−25(4)+3(2)+ln2+21
=316−10+6+ln2+0.5
=316−4+0.5+ln2
=316−12+21+ln2
=34+21+ln2
=68+3+ln2=611+ln2.
Difference:
(12179+2ln2)−(611+ln2)
=12179−1222+ln2
=12157+ln2.
So p=157,q=12.
p+q=169.
Let's verify this with the Python code.
[/THOUGHT]
[PYTHON]
from sympy import symbols, integrate, simplify, ln, Rational
s = symbols('s', real=True, positive=True)
Integrand derived: (2s^4 + 3s^3) / (1+s)^2
integrand = (2s**4 + 3s**3) / (1 + s)**2
Limits
s1 = 1
s2 = 3
Compute integral
result = integrate(integrand, (s, s1, s2))
print(f"Result: {result}")
Check if result matches 157/12 + ln(2)
expected = Rational(157, 12) + ln(2)
print(f"Expected: {expected}")
print(f"Difference: {simplify(result - expected)}")
[/PYTHON]
[THOUGHT]
The code will confirm the result.
Result should be 157/12 + log(2).
The question asks for p+q where the value is qp+ln2.
p=157, q=12.
p+q=157+12=169.
Wait, I should double check if the fraction can be simplified.
157 is not divisible by 2 (odd).
Sum of digits 1+5+7 = 13, not divisible by 3.
157 ends in 7, not 5.
157 / 7 = 22.4...
157 / 11 = 14.2...
157 / 13 = 12.07...
Square root of 157 is approx 12.5.
Primes to check: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11. None work.
So 157 is likely prime.
Thus the fraction is in simplest form.
The problem statement says "If the value is qp+ln2".
It does not explicitly say "in simplest form", but usually that is implied or p,q are coprime integers.
Given the specific form, I will assume p=157,q=12.
Let's double check the question wording carefully.
"If the value is qp+ln2, compute p+q."
This implies the coefficient of ln2 is exactly 1.
My manual calculation gave ln2 (from 2ln2−ln2).
So the form matches.
Let's verify the integration steps again.
u=s+1.
Integrand in u: 2u2−5u+3+u−1−u−2.
Integral: 32u3−25u2+3u+lnu+u−1.
Upper limit u=4:
2/3(64)−5/2(16)+12+ln4+1/4
=128/3−40+12+2ln2+1/4
=128/3−28+1/4+2ln2
=(512−336+3)/12+2ln2
=179/12+2ln2. Correct.
Lower limit u=2:
2/3(8)−5/2(4)+6+ln2+1/2
=16/3−10+6+ln2+1/2
=16/3−4+1/2+ln2
=(32−24+3)/6+ln2
=11/6+ln2. Correct.
Difference:
179/12−22/12+(2ln2−ln2)
=157/12+ln2. Correct.
Final check of the problem statement details.
f(x)=21x2−x+ln(1+x).
t=sf′(s).
f′(x)=x−1+1+x1=1+xx2.
t=1+ss3.
Integral limits: t=1/2 to t=27/4.
s1: 2s3−s−1=0⟹s=1.
s2: 4s3−27s−27=0⟹s=3.
Integral is ∫1/227/4g(t)dt=∫13sdsdtds.
Everything looks consistent.
One detail: "distance between the foot of the perpendicular ... and the point where the tangent ... meets the y-axis".
Foot of perp from (s,f(s)) to y-axis is (0,f(s)).
Tangent y-intercept is (0,f(s)−sf′(s)).
Distance is ∣f(s)−(f(s)−sf′(s))∣=∣sf′(s)∣.
Since s>0 and f′(s)=1+ss2>0, distance is sf′(s).
This matches my derivation.
The integral is ∫g(t)dt.
Let u=g(t), so t=f(u) (using f for the relation between t and s, not the original function).
Actually, let's stick to s and t. s=g(t).
∫t1t2sdt.
Integration by parts?
∫sdt=[st]−∫tds.
Let's check this alternative method.
[st]s=1s=3−∫131+ss3ds.
t(3)=427. s=3⟹st=3⋅427=481.
t(1)=21. s=1⟹st=1⋅21=21.
Boundary term: 481−21=481−2=479.
Integral term: ∫131+ss3ds.
1+ss3=1+ss3+1−1=s2−s+1−1+s1.
Integral is [31s3−21s2+s−ln(1+s)]13.
At 3: 9−4.5+3−ln4=7.5−2ln2.
At 1: 1/3−1/2+1−ln2=5/6−ln2.
Difference: (7.5−5/6)+(−2ln2+ln2).
7.5=15/2=45/6.
45/6−5/6=40/6=20/3.
So integral part is 20/3−ln2.
Total result: 479−(320−ln2).
=479−320+ln2.
=12237−80+ln2
=12157+ln2.
Matches perfectly.
p=157,q=12.
p+q=169.
One final check on the code execution to be absolutely sure.
[/THOUGHT]
[PYTHON]
from sympy import symbols, integrate, ln, Rational
s = symbols('s', real=True, positive=True)
Method 1: Direct integration
integrand = (2s**4 + 3s**3) / (1 + s)**2
res1 = integrate(integrand, (s, 1, 3))
print(f"Method 1: {res1}")
Method 2: Integration by parts
int s dt = [st] - int t ds
term1 = Rational(79, 4)
term2 = integrate(s**3 / (1 + s), (s, 1, 3))
res2 = term1 - term2
print(f"Method 2: {res2}")
Check equality
print(f"Equal? {res1 == res2}")
[/PYTHON]
[THOUGHT]
Both methods yield the same result.
The value is 12157+ln2.
p=157.
q=12.
p+q=169.
The question asks for p+q.
Final Answer seems to be 169.
[/THOUGHT]
[THOUGHT]
I have verified the solution using two different integration methods and Python code.
The value of the integral is 12157+ln2.
This is in the form qp+ln2.
p=157, q=12.
p+q=157+12=169.
I am confident in this result.
[/THOUGHT]
\boxed{169}