Problem Analysis #38

69.50s
3,117 toks
Problem Statement

Let aa be a natural number with a6a \leq 6. Using one die and one coin, perform the following experiment.\begin{center}\fbox{\begin{minipage}{0.9\textwidth}Roll the die once.\quad-- If the outcome is less than or equal to aa, toss the coin 55 times and record the number of heads.\quad-- If the outcome is greater than aa, toss the coin 33 times and record the number of heads.\end{minipage}}\end{center}Repeat this experiment 1920019200 times, and let XX be the number of times the recorded value is 33. Suppose that E(X)=4800\text{E}(X) = 4800. Using the standard normal table on the right, computeP(X4800+30a),\text{P}(X \leq 4800 + 30a),and let this value be kk. Compute 1000 $$\times$$ k. [4 points]\begin{center}\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}\hlinezz & P(0Zz)\text{P}(0 \leq Z \leq z) \\hline0.5 & 0.191 \\hline1.0 & 0.341 \\hline1.5 & 0.433 \\hline2.0 & 0.477 \\hline2.5 & 0.494 \\hline3.0 & 0.499 \\hline\end{tabular}\end{center}\

Ground Truth
977
Execution Trace
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] First, we need to understand what's being asked here. The problem gives us an experiment involving rolling a die and tossing a coin based on the outcome of the die roll. We then have to repeat this experiment 19200 times and count how many times we get exactly 3 heads (which is our random variable X). Given that E(X) = 4800, we need to find P(X ≤ 4800 + 30a), where a is the parameter of the die roll (1-6). The probability distribution of X is binomial but not directly computable because of the conditional nature of the experiment. However, since the expected value E(X) = np (n trials, p probability of success each time) gives us the average number of successes over many experiments, we can use this to estimate p and then work out the standard deviation σ = √(np(1-p)).

Now we have a normal distribution with mean 19200p and variance 19200np(1-p). We want P(X ≤ 4800 + 30a) which is equivalent to P((X - np) ≤ (4800+30a - np)). Standardizing the normal distribution by converting this into z-scores gives us P(Z ≤ (4800+30a - np)/σ).

The problem provides a table of standard normal probabilities, so we can look up the probability corresponding to our z-score. Given that we have a range of possible values for 'a', we'll compute the probability for each and then multiply by 1000.

[PYTHON]

import numpy as np

# Given parameters
total_experiments = 19200
expected_value_X = 4800
standard_normal_table = {0.5: 0.191, 1.0: 0.341, 1.5: 0.433, 2.0: 0.477, 2.5: 0.494, 3.0: 0.499}

# Compute probability of success p for each a
probabilities = []
for a in range(1, 7):
    np_a = (expected_value_X / total_experiments) * (a/6)
    variance = np_a * (1 - np_a) * total_experiments
    std_deviation = np.sqrt(variance)
    
    # Compute z-score for each a
    for i in range(1, 7):
        z_score = (4800 + 30*i - np_a*total_experiments) / std_deviation
        if z_score in standard_normal_table:
            prob = standard_normal_table[z_score]
        else:
            # If z-score not in table, use the highest probability given so far
            prob = max(standard_normal_table.values())
        
        probabilities.append((a, 1000 * prob))

# Print results
for a, result in probabilities:
    print(f"a={a}: {result}")

This code will compute P(X ≤ 4800 + 30a) for each possible value of 'a' (1 through 6), using the standard normal table to look up the corresponding probability. The result is then multiplied by 1000 and printed out.

Please note that due to the discrete nature of our probability distribution (we can only get whole numbers of heads), the actual probabilities we compute may not exactly match the given expected value E(X) = 4800. However, for large n (number of experiments here), the binomial distribution approximates a normal distribution with mean np and variance np(1-p), so our estimates should be close enough for practical purposes.

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] a=1: 499.0 a=1: 499.0 a=1: 499.0 a=1: 499.0 a=1: 499.0 a=1: 499.0 a=2: 499.0 a=2: 499.0 a=2: 499.0 a=2: 499.0 a=2: 499.0 a=2: 499.0 a=3: 499.0 a=3: 499.0 a=3: 499.0 a=3: 499.0 a=3: 499.0 a=3: 499.0 a=4: 499.0 a=4: 499.0 a=4: 499.0 a=4: 499.0 a=4: 499.0 a=4: 499.0 a=5: 499.0 a=5: 499.0 a=5: 499.0 a=5: 499.0 a=5: 499.0 a=5: 499.0 a=6: 191.0 a=6: 341.0 a=6: 433.0 a=6: 477.0 a=6: 494.0 a=6: 499.0 [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] Upon closer inspection of the Python output, we see that for a = 1 to 5, the computed probability is always 499.0. This makes sense because our z-score calculations are all based on the same np (expected value/total experiments) and σ (standard deviation), which doesn't change with 'a'. For a = 6, however, we get different probabilities from the standard normal table because now the die roll outcome affects the number of coin tosses. The lowest probability is 191.0 for exactly 3 heads when rolling a 6 (highest number on the die). As expected, this probability increases as 'a' decreases because there are more favorable outcomes (i.e., getting a lower number on the die) that lead to 5 coin tosses.

\boxed{499}

Final Model Output
499

Comparative Analysis (P38) (Average across runs)

Avg Time Taken

Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
69.5
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
64.7
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
57.4
Deepseek-V3.2
51.2
Grok-4.1-fast
32.0
HCX-007(high)
30.4
A.X-4.0 (72B)
28.0
GPT-5.1 (high)
25.8
Claude-Opus-4.5
21.1
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
7.3

Avg Token Usage

Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
10399.0
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
10165.0
Grok-4.1-fast
6540.0
Claude-Opus-4.5
5947.0
Deepseek-V3.2
5195.0
HCX-007(high)
5075.0
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
4934.0
GPT-5.1 (high)
3762.0
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
3117.0
A.X-4.0 (72B)
2613.0