Problem Analysis #5

53.52s
13,647 toks
Problem Statement

Consider the following procedure that generates a sequence of random variables that take the value 00 or 11. For an integer n1n \ge 1, we denote the nn-th random variable of a sequence generated by the procedure as XnX_n.

  • X1X_1 becomes X1=0X_1 = 0 with probability 23\dfrac{2}{3} and X1=1X_1 = 1 with probability 13\dfrac{1}{3}.

  • For integers n=1,2,n = 1,2,\ldots in order, the following is repeated until the procedure terminates:

  • The procedure terminates with probability pp (0<p<10 < p < 1) if Xn=0X_n = 0, and with probability qq (0<q<10 < q < 1) if Xn=1X_n = 1. Here pp and qq are fixed constants.

  • If the procedure does not terminate at step nn, then Xn+1X_{n+1} becomes 00 with probability 23\dfrac{2}{3} and 11 with probability 13\dfrac{1}{3}.

When the procedure terminates at n=n = \ell, a sequence of length \ell, composed of random variables (X1,,X)(X_1,\ldots, X_\ell), is generated, and no further random variables are generated.\subsection*{I.}For an integer k1k \ge 1, consider the matrixPk=(Pr(Xn+k=0Xn=0)Pr(Xn+k=1Xn=0)Pr(Xn+k=0Xn=1)Pr(Xn+k=1Xn=1)).P_k =\begin{pmatrix}\Pr(X_{n+k} = 0 \mid X_n = 0) & \Pr(X_{n+k} = 1 \mid X_n = 0) \\\Pr(X_{n+k} = 0 \mid X_n = 1) & \Pr(X_{n+k} = 1 \mid X_n = 1)\end{pmatrix}.

  • [(1)] Express P1P_1 and P2P_2 in terms of pp and qq.

  • [(2)] Express P3P_3 using P1P_1.

  • [(3)] The matrix PkP_k can be expressed in the form Pk=γkP1P_k = \gamma_k P_1 for a real number γk\gamma_k. Find γk\gamma_k. \subsection*{II.}For an integer m2m \ge 2, find the respective probabilities that Xm=0X_m = 0 and Xm=1X_m = 1, given that the procedure does not terminate before n=mn = m.\subsection*{III.}Let \ell be the length of the sequence generated by the procedure. Find the expected value and the variance of \ell. If necessary, you may usem=1mrm1=1(1r)2,m=1m2rm1=1+r(1r)3\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} m r^{m-1} = \frac{1}{(1-r)^2},\qquad\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} m^2 r^{m-1} = \frac{1+r}{(1-r)^3}for a real number rr with r<1|r| < 1.\subsection*{IV.}For an integer k1k \ge 1, find the probability Pr(Xn=0Xn+k=1)\Pr(X_n = 0 \mid X_{n+k} = 1).\subsection*{V. Final quantity}In this part, assume p=12p = \dfrac{1}{2} and q=13q = \dfrac{1}{3}.

  • Let α\alpha be the probability in {\rm IV} for these values of pp and qq: α:=Pr(Xn=0Xn+k=1). \alpha := \Pr(X_n = 0 \mid X_{n+k} = 1).

  • Let β\beta be the expected value of \ell obtained in {\rm III}, and let σ2\sigma^2 be the variance of \ell in {\rm III}.

  • In {\rm I(3)}, P2P_2 can be written as P2=γ2P1P_2 = \gamma_2 P_1. Let λ:=γ2 \lambda := \gamma_2 for p=12p = \dfrac{1}{2} and q=13q = \dfrac{1}{3}. DefineK=13320(αβ+σ2λ)+7.\mathcal{K}= 13 \cdot 320\left( \alpha \beta + \frac{\sigma^2}{\lambda} \right) + 7.Compute the integer K\mathcal{K}.\

Ground Truth
26683
Execution Trace
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] All parts solved analytically. For p=1/2, q=1/3:

s = (2/3)(1/2) + (1/3)(2/3) = 5/9

t = 1 - s = 4/9

β = 1/t = 9/4

σ² = s / t² = 45/16

α = [(2/3)(1/2)] / s = 3/5

λ = γ₂ = s = 5/9

Then α β + σ²/λ = 27/20 + 81/16 = 513/80

13 * 320 * (513/80) + 7 = 26683

Verify with Python. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] p = 1/2 q = 1/3 pi0 = 2/3 pi1 = 1/3 r0 = 1 - p r1 = 1 - q s = pi0 * r0 + pi1 * r1 t = pi0 * p + pi1 * q beta = 1 / t sigma2 = s / t**2 alpha = (pi0 * r0) / s lam = s inner = alpha * beta + sigma2 / lam K = 13 * 320 * inner + 7 print(K) [/PYTHON]

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] 26683.000000000004 [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] The Python output is 26683.000000000004, which is exactly 26683 as an integer. [/THOUGHT] \boxed{26683}

Explanation

The reasoning systematically addresses each part of the problem to compute (\mathcal{K}), relying on analytical derivations verified by Python.

For part I, the matrices (P_k) are derived from transition probabilities. Specifically, (P_1) is the one-step transition matrix: [ P_1 = \begin{pmatrix} (1-p) \cdot \frac{2}{3} & (1-p) \cdot \frac{1}{3} \ (1-q) \cdot \frac{2}{3} & (1-q) \cdot \frac{1}{3} \end{pmatrix}. ] (P_2 = P_1^2), and (P_3 = P_1^3). For part I(3), (P_k = \gamma_k P_1) where (\gamma_k) is the common scaling factor from the matrix powers, determined as (\gamma_k = [(1-p) \cdot \frac{2}{3} + (1-q) \cdot \frac{1}{3}]^{k-1}), so (\gamma_2 = s = (1-p) \cdot \frac{2}{3} + (1-q) \cdot \frac{1}{3}).

For part II, given no termination before (m), the probabilities are proportional to survival paths: (\Pr(X_m=0 \mid \text{no term. before } m) = \frac{(1-p)^{m-1} \cdot \frac{2}{3}}{\sum}), but normalized by the survival probability up to (m-1).

For part III, (\ell) follows a modified geometric process. Let (s = \frac{2}{3}(1-p) + \frac{1}{3}(1-q)) (probability of continuing after a step) and (t = 1 - s) (probability of terminating at any step, averaged). Then (\mathbb{E}[\ell] = \beta = \frac{1}{t}) and (\mathrm{Var}(\ell) = \sigma^2 = \frac{s}{t^2}), using the given sums for geometric expectations.

For part IV, (\Pr(X_n=0 \mid X_{n+k}=1)) uses backward conditioning via the stationary or conditional paths, yielding (\alpha = \frac{\frac{2}{3}(1-p)}{s}) for large separations, as derived from the detailed balance.

With (p = \frac{1}{2}), (q = \frac{1}{3}):

  • (s = \frac{2}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{2}{3} = \frac{5}{9}),
  • (t = 1 - s = \frac{4}{9}),
  • (\beta = \frac{9}{4}),
  • (\sigma^2 = \frac{5/9}{(4/9)^2} = \frac{45}{16}),
  • (\alpha = \frac{\frac{2}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{2}}{5/9} = \frac{3}{5}),
  • (\lambda = \gamma_2 = s = \frac{5}{9}).

Then (\alpha \beta + \frac{\sigma^2}{\lambda} = \frac{3}{5} \cdot \frac{9}{4} + \frac{45/16}{5/9} = \frac{27}{20} + \frac{81}{16} = \frac{513}{80}).

Finally, (\mathcal{K} = 13 \cdot 320 \cdot \frac{513}{80} + 7 = 26683), confirmed exactly by the Python computation.

Final Model Output
26683

Comparative Analysis (P5) (Average across runs)

Avg Time Taken

GPT-5.1 (high)
467.8
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
340.9
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
321.5
Deepseek-V3.2
272.4
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
246.2
A.X-4.0 (72B)
191.5
Grok-4.1-fast
53.5
Claude-Opus-4.5
42.6
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
20.3
HCX-007(high)
18.8

Avg Token Usage

Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
23391.0
A.X-4.0 (72B)
20243.0
GPT-5.1 (high)
19161.0
Deepseek-V3.2
16929.0
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
16067.0
Claude-Opus-4.5
14573.0
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
14044.0
Grok-4.1-fast
13647.0
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
6754.0
HCX-007(high)
5076.0