Infron · Motif 3 · 46문항 × 3회 · Python TAR. 131,072 output tokens · 기본 1,800초 · 6+1 turns. ACC는 전체 138회, Pass@1은 각 문항의 첫 유효 시도, Pass@3는 3회 내 정답으로 계산합니다.
Problem Statement
매개변수 t로 나타내어진 곡선 , 를 C라 하자. 곡선 C가 직선 와 만나는 점을 P라 할 때, 곡선 C 위의 점 P에서의 접선의 기울기는?
① ② ③ ④ ⑤
최종 답은 선택지 번호 1~5 중 하나를 안에 쓰세요.
Ground Truth
2
Recorded model response / solution
Reasoning Process
Recorded Python call:
import sympy as sp
# define symbols
t = sp.symbols('t', real=True)
pi = sp.pi
# define x and y
x = sp.exp(4*t) * (1 + sp.sin(pi*t)**2)
y = sp.exp(4*t) * (1 - 3*sp.cos(pi*t)**2)
# condition: y = 3x - 5e
eq = sp.Eq(y, 3*x - 5*sp.exp(1))
# solve for t
sol = sp.solve(eq, t)
sol
Tool Output
Execution succeeded
Reasoning Process
Recorded Python call:
t_val = sp.Rational(1,4)
# compute dy/dx = (dy/dt)/(dx/dt) at t=1/4
dx_dt = sp.diff(x, t)
dy_dt = sp.diff(y, t)
slope = (dy_dt/dx_dt).subs(t, t_val).simplify()
slope
Tool Output
Execution failed
name 'sp' is not defined
Reasoning Process
Recorded Python call:
import sympy as sp
t = sp.symbols('t', real=True)
pi = sp.pi
x = sp.exp(4*t) * (1 + sp.sin(pi*t)**2)
y = sp.exp(4*t) * (1 - 3*sp.cos(pi*t)**2)
# Condition check at t=1/4
t_val = sp.Rational(1,4)
x_val = x.subs(t, t_val).simplify()
y_val = y.subs(t, t_val).simplify()
x_val, y_val, (y_val - (3*x_val - 5*sp.exp(1))).simplify()
Tool Output
Execution succeeded
Reasoning Process
Recorded Python call:
import sympy as sp
t = sp.symbols('t', real=True)
pi = sp.pi
x = sp.exp(4*t) * (1 + sp.sin(pi*t)**2)
y = sp.exp(4*t) * (1 - 3*sp.cos(pi*t)**2)
t_val = sp.Rational(1,4)
x_val = x.subs(t, t_val).simplify()
y_val = y.subs(t, t_val).simplify()
print("x =", x_val)
print("y =", y_val)
print("line check:", (y_val - (3*x_val - 5*sp.exp(1))).simplify())
dx_dt = sp.diff(x, t)
dy_dt = sp.diff(y, t)
slope = (dy_dt/dx_dt).subs(t, t_val).simplify()
print("slope =", slope)
Tool Output
Execution succeeded
x = 3*E/2
y = -E/2
line check: 0
slope = (-2 + 3*pi)/(pi + 6)
Reasoning Process
풀이
주어진 곡선은
이고, 직선은 이다. 교점 는 다음을 만족한다.
따라서 점 는 에 대응한다.
접선의 기울기 를 계산한다.
에서 , , 이므로
따라서 정답은 ②이다.
Final Model Output
2
Comparative Analysis (Pcalculus_27) (Average across runs)
Averages use reported measurements only. Missing usage is not treated as zero.
Avg Time Taken
Union Alpha
90.3
Motif 3
63.3
Solar Pro 4
41.2
Grok 4.7
36.2
MiMo V2.6 Pro
27.1
Muse Spark 1.3
12.5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
10.8
Solar Mini 4 Preview
9.6
Avg Token Usage
Motif 3
17,230
Grok 4.7
13,359
Solar Mini 4 Preview
7,445
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
5,702
Union Alpha
5,645
Muse Spark 1.3
5,510
Solar Pro 4
4,984
MiMo V2.6 Pro
3,867